Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease: existing evidence and knowledge gaps

14Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is well known that the worldwide prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has risen to over 10% of the general population during the past decades. Patients with CKD are at increased risk of both kidney failure and cardiovascular disease (CVD), posing a substantial health challenge. Therefore, screening for CKD is warranted to identify and treat patients early to prevent progression and complications. In this issue of the Journal, Yeo and colleagues provide an updated systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of screening for CKD in the general adult population. They show that screening for CKD in high-risk populations is cost-effective and that there is limited evidence for screening the general population. It should be noted that most studies they discuss do not consider the benefit of screening to prevent CVD in addition to preventing kidney failure, the treatment effect of novel therapeutic agents such as SGLT2 inhibitors, and the possibility of screening in a home-based setting. These three aspects will likely improve the cost-effectiveness of CKD screening, making it feasible to move towards general population screening for CKD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Mil, D., Pouwels, X. G. L. V., Heerspink, H. J. L., & Gansevoort, R. T. (2024, January 1). Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease: existing evidence and knowledge gaps. Clinical Kidney Journal. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad254

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free