Affirmative Refusals: Reclaiming Political Imagination with Bonnie Honig and Lola Olufemi

  • Seitz S
  • Seitz S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article reconstructs Bonnie Honig's A Feminist Theory of Refusal (2021) and brings it into dialogue with Lola Olufemi's Experiments in Imagining Otherwise (2021). I set out by showing how both Olufemi and Honig reclaim radical political imagination in a time of vanishing alternatives, focusing on the notion of refusal as well as on the powers and limitations of the historical archive. Second, I retrace Honig's way of conceptualizing feminist refusal by taking up three 'refusal concepts,' namely inoperativity (Agamben), inclination (Cavarero), and fabulation (Hartman) via a reading of Euripides's Bacchae tragedy. In Honig, the play serves a double purpose: it exemplifies and critically radicalizes the three refusal concepts that she envisages. Turning to Olufemi, the idea is that her Experiments can be read in a similar way in regard to Honig's own reflections: namely as both exemplifying and challenging various aspects of Honig's refusal theory, thus further radicalizing political imagination.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seitz, S., & Seitz, S. (2022). Affirmative Refusals: Reclaiming Political Imagination with Bonnie Honig and Lola Olufemi. Genealogy+Critique, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/gc.9942

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free