Storm runoff and sediment losses from forest clearcutting and stand re-establishment with best management practices in East Texas, USA

52Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nine small (2.5 ha) and four large (70-135 ha) watersheds were instrumented in 1999 to evaluate the effects of intensive silvicultural practices with best management practices (BMPs) on runoff and stream water quality in the Western Gulf Coastal Plain of East Texas, USA. Two treatments were implemented in 2002: a conventional treatment with clearcutting and herbicide site preparation, and an intensive treatment that added subsoiling, fertilization and a release herbicide application. Watershed effects were compared with results from a previously conducted study on the same watersheds in 1981, in which two combinations of harvesting and mechanical site preparation without BMPs were evaluated. Due to the reduction in evapotranspirational demand, total storm runoff increased on all six treated small watersheds following harvest by 0.94 to 13.73 cm in 2003. Runoff increases were not statistically significant on the treated large watersheds. Total first-year sediment loss was significantly greater on two of the conventional and one of the intensive small watersheds. The greatest first-year increase was 540.1 kg ha-1, only one-fifth of that observed on these watersheds from shearing and windrowing without BMPs in 1981. First-year sediment loss was significantly greater on the intensive large watershed following harvest, but not on the conventional large watershed. These data suggest that BMPs are very effective in reducing potential water quality impacts from intensive silvicultural practices. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McBroom, M. W., Beasley, R. S., Chang, M., & Ice, G. G. (2008). Storm runoff and sediment losses from forest clearcutting and stand re-establishment with best management practices in East Texas, USA. Hydrological Processes, 22(10), 1509–1522. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6703

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free