Abstract
In this article we review the epistemological and pedagogical debate on Kinesiology and Physical Education that has been going on in the universities of the US from 1990 to the present. We have compiled the opinions of a wide sample of authors, with the intention of getting the most complete picture of a process that, according to Morrow (2006), seeks to answer the questions “where we come from, who we are, and where we are going”. After comparing and analysing the most relevant documents, we conclude that the period 1990-2013, characterized by a bitter struggle between paradigms fought by humanists, positivists, cross-disciplinarists, and sub-disciplinarists, has revealed the eventual predominance of the integrative paradigm of Kretchmar (2007, 2008). © 2016, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid y CV Ciencias del Deporte. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rodríguez-López, J., Vicente-Pedraz, M., & Mañas-Bastida, A. (2016). Luchas y pacificación en la historia de la kinesiología americana / Struggles and Pacification in the History of American Kinesiology. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de La Actividad Física y Del Deporte, 62(2016), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2016.62.006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.