Reconstruction of Trees

  • Manvel B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Every tree T determines a set of distinct maximal proper subtrees T i = T — v i , which are obtained by the deletion of an endpoint of T . In this paper we prove that a tree is almost always uniquely determined by this set of its subtrees, and point out two interesting consequences of this result. In [ 5 ], Ulam proposed the following conjecture, which we state in a slightly stronger form due to Harary [ 1 ]. ULAM'S CONJECTURE. A graph G with at least three points is uniquely determined up to isomorphism by the subgraphs G i = G — v i . Kelly [ 4 ] proved the conjecture for trees and Harary and Palmer [ 3 ] showed that not all of the G i are needed in that case by proving Corollary 1 below. If we remove from the list of subgraphs G i of a graph G all but one graph of each isomorphism type, we obtain a set of G i which are distinct up to isomorphism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manvel, B. (1970). Reconstruction of Trees. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 22(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.4153/cjm-1970-007-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free