We adopted a social cognitive approach of motivation (Bandura, 1986, 1989, 2003) to examine the influence of normative feedback and self-set goals on positive discrepancy creation and goal revision in the face of a novel task. The moderating effects of self-efficacy and regulatory focus were also examined. A laboratory study in- cluding 297 undergraduate students demonstrated that feedback, whether based on normative standards of per- formance or goal-performance discrepancies was a strong predictor of positive discrepancy creation and goal re- vision. Self-efficacy was also an independent predictor of goal revision, but regulatory focus was not. These findings have important practical implications for a variety of performance contexts (e.g., work, school, sports). Individuals will modify their goals based largely on feedback received (goal-performance discrepancies and normative standards); however, self-efficacy independently influences goal revision beyond the effects of feed- back. Other implications for research and practice are discussed.
CITATION STYLE
Nicklin, J. M., & Williams, K. J. (2011). Self-Regulation of Goals and Performance: Effects of Discrepancy Feedback, Regulatory Focus, and Self-Efficacy. Psychology, 02(03), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.23030
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.