Self-Regulation of Goals and Performance: Effects of Discrepancy Feedback, Regulatory Focus, and Self-Efficacy

  • Nicklin J
  • Williams K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We adopted a social cognitive approach of motivation (Bandura, 1986, 1989, 2003) to examine the influence of normative feedback and self-set goals on positive discrepancy creation and goal revision in the face of a novel task. The moderating effects of self-efficacy and regulatory focus were also examined. A laboratory study in- cluding 297 undergraduate students demonstrated that feedback, whether based on normative standards of per- formance or goal-performance discrepancies was a strong predictor of positive discrepancy creation and goal re- vision. Self-efficacy was also an independent predictor of goal revision, but regulatory focus was not. These findings have important practical implications for a variety of performance contexts (e.g., work, school, sports). Individuals will modify their goals based largely on feedback received (goal-performance discrepancies and normative standards); however, self-efficacy independently influences goal revision beyond the effects of feed- back. Other implications for research and practice are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicklin, J. M., & Williams, K. J. (2011). Self-Regulation of Goals and Performance: Effects of Discrepancy Feedback, Regulatory Focus, and Self-Efficacy. Psychology, 02(03), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.23030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free