The investment case for cervical cancer elimination

15Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We already know what causes cervical cancer, how to prevent it, and how to treat it, even in resource-constrained settings. Inequitable access to human papillomavirus vaccine for girls and screening and precancer treatment for women in low- and middle-income countries is unacceptable on ethical, social, and financial grounds. The burden of cervical cancer falls on the poor and extends beyond the narrow bounds of the family, affecting national economic development and community life, as family resources are drained and poverty tightens its grip. Proven solutions are available and the priorities for the next few years are clear, as shown by the papers in this Supplement. Sustained political commitment and strategic investments in cervical cancer prevention can not only save millions of lives over the next 10 years, but can also pave the way for the broader fight against all cancers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsu, V. D., & Ginsburg, O. (2017). The investment case for cervical cancer elimination. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 138, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12193

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free