Case Procter & Gamble: 188 years of dynamic capabilities development. A longitudinal case analysis

  • López Lomelí M
  • Toldos M
  • Rentería-Salcedo J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G), with 188 years of successful operation in highly dynamic environments, reported fiscal year 2025 net sales of $84.3 billion (P&G, 2025). Founded as a family business in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA., P&G is currently ranked among the world’s leading consumer goods companies. This study adopts an exploratory, longitudinal qualitative study approach to examine how P&G has developed, accumulated, and renewed dynamic capabilities over time. The research combines a systematic review of the literature on the resource-based view and the dynamic capabilities framework with the analysis of archival secondary data from authoritative corporate and historical sources, complemented by practitioner-based insights derived from the lead author of this paper (Miguel Ángel López Lomelí) long-term managerial experience within P&G across Mexico, the United States, and Latin America. The objective of the case is to enable readers to analytically examine P&G’s dynamic capabilities and, based on this analysis, assess the firm’s strategic position and propose future-oriented marketing strategies. Additionally, the study proposes a conceptual model for the creation of dynamic capabilities. The explanatory power of this model is analytically validated through its systematic application to the P&G case, demonstrating how managerial behaviour, organisational knowledge management, and social capital interact under conditions of environmental complexity, uncertainty, and dynamism to support sustained superior performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

López Lomelí, M. Á., Toldos, M. P., & Rentería-Salcedo, J. A. (2025). Case Procter & Gamble: 188 years of dynamic capabilities development. A longitudinal case analysis. Multidisciplinary Business Review, 18(2), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.18.2.8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free