Health Fitness Professionals’ Perceptions to Offering a Cancer Exercise Program: A Qualitative Study

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study is to qualitatively investigate fitness professionals’ perceptions of barriers and enablers to offering community-based exercise programs targeting cancer survivors at their fitness and/or community centers. Methods: A qualitative case study approach incorporating Web-based survey and semistructured interview components was used to evaluate community-based fitness professionals’ programming perceptions. Results: A total of seven subjects completed a semistructured interview. Data analysis using content analysis and the constant comparative method process revealed three primary domains with 11 underlying themes: 1) program barriers (education and awareness, physician referral, cost, and care along the cancer continuum); 2) program enablers (champion advocacy, sponsor/funding, personnel, and propositional solutions); and 3) program perceptions (social support, gym atmosphere, and cancer-specific modifications). Conclusions: Findings from this qualitative study identified multiple domains and themes articulating health and fitness professionals’ perceptions of key barriers, enablers, and programmatic aspects in offering community-based exercise cancer programming. These results have important implications for guiding the design and delivery of community-based exercise programs for cancer survivors and represent an advance in the current literature surrounding implementation strategies in a clinic-to-community translational model of exercise-based supportive cancer care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeScenza, V. R., Chaplow, Z. L., Bowman, J., Sutherland, S., & Focht, B. C. (2022). Health Fitness Professionals’ Perceptions to Offering a Cancer Exercise Program: A Qualitative Study. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free