Therapeutic and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma

17Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC), very few studies have compared oncological outcomes and renal function preservation rates in nephron-sparing robotassisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 126 patients with cT1 RCC treated with RAPN (n=78) and computed tomography-guided PCA (n=48) between March 2016 and November 2019. Clinical data and outcomes were compared for the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates in the two groups (p=0.17 and p=0.093, respectively). The median percentage of estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation at 6 months after surgery was 91.8% and 91.4% in the RAPN and PCA groups, respectively (p=0.9). Conclusion: In patients with cT1a RCC, oncological outcomes and renal function appear similar following RAPN and PCA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uemura, T., Kato, T., Nagahara, A., Kawashima, A., Hatano, K., Ujike, T., … Uemura, M. (2021). Therapeutic and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma. In Vivo, 35(3), 1573–1579. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free