Mortality analysis in hip fracture patients: Implications for design of future outcome trials

134Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction. Patients with hip fractures are usually frail and elderly with a 30-day mortality in excess of 10% in European series. Perioperative morbidity is often multifactorial in nature, and unimodal interventions will not necessarily decrease mortality. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyse causes of mortality, and thereby the potential and limitations to decrease mortality after hip fracture surgery. Methods. 300 consecutive, unselected hip fracture patients were treated in a multimodal rehabilitation programme with continuous perioperative epidural analgesia and anaesthesia, early surgery, standardized fluid and transfusion therapy, enforced oral nutrition and early mobilization and physiotherapy. All deaths within 30 days of surgery or during primary hospitalization were analysed and classified according to whether death was unavoidable, probably unavoidable, or potentially avoidable. Results. Thirty-day mortality was 13.3% (40 patients) and the total perioperative mortality was 15.6% (47 patients). Death was definitely unavoidable in 28%, probably unavoidable in 15%, and in theory potentially avoidable in 57%. In the patients where death was potentially avoidable, active care was curtailed in 16 of 27 (59%) patients. Conclusion. About a quarter of the total mortality in hip fracture patients is definitely unavoidable, and death is probably only avoidable in about half of the unselected patients. These results have important implications for the design of future outcome studies, which should focus on other relevant outcomes than mortality per se. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foss, N. B., & Kehlet, H. (2005). Mortality analysis in hip fracture patients: Implications for design of future outcome trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 94(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free