Current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy in male patients

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During radical cystectomy (RC), the neurovascular bundles are easily removed or damaged, leading to varying rates of incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The nerve-sparing technique was developed to preserve urinary and erectile function. The adoption of laparoscopic and robot-assisted technology has improved visualization and dexterity of pelvic surgeries, thus facilitate the nerve-sparing technique. Although nerve-sparing RC is technically similar with nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, there are still some anatomical differences. There are mainly three different types of nerve-sparing techniques. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is another important factor to influence erectile function and urinary continence. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) may be an optimal treatment choice in well-selected younger patients with low-volume, organ-confined disease. We should attempt to do, whenever possible, a nerve-sparing cystectomy at least on oneside. However, due to the need of a well-refined surgical technique, nerve-sparing LRC and RARC is now being performed only by experienced urological surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, J., Fan, X., & Dong, W. (2016, July 1). Current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy in male patients. Asian Journal of Urology. Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free