Immunophenotypic analysis enables the correct prediction of t(8;21) in acute myeloid leukaemia

26Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Immunophenotypic findings from 14 patients affected by acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t(8;21) were compared to those obtained from 79 AML patients with normal or other aberrant karyotypes. Classic lineage markers, adhesion molecules, surface enzymes, stem-cell-related antigens and HLA-DR were investigated. Following evaluation by the Mann-Whitney test, we found that t(8;21) AMLs showed a significantly higher expression of CD19, CD34, CD56, CD45RA and CD54. Conversely, blasts from patients in the control group significantly expressed higher levels of CD45R0, CD33, CD36, CD11b and CD14. In order to split the data at the best cut-off point to achieve the most homogenous subset with regard to cytogenetic pattern, i.e. t(8;21) or not, the CART (Classification and Regression Trees) method was applied. In the univariate analysis by CART, statistically significant differences were found when CD19 was dichotomized at 10%, CD34 at 37%, CD45RA at 84%, CD54 at 21%, CD56 at 12%, CD36 at 14%, CD45R0 at 25%, CD11b at 18% and CD14 at 12%. Once cut-off points were established by CART, we applied the logistic regression model to establish which combination of two or more antigens was most predictive for t(8;21). The combination CD19-CD34 at the cut-off points indicated above correctly classified 92/93 cases (98.9%). The addition of any other antigen combination to the CD19/CD34 model failed to improve the level of prediction. We conclude that AML with t(8;21) displays an exclusive immunophenotype that is highly predictive of the cytogenetic pattern.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrara, F., Di Noto, R., Annunziata, M., Copia, C., Lo Pardo, C., Boccuni, P., … Del Vecchio, L. (1998). Immunophenotypic analysis enables the correct prediction of t(8;21) in acute myeloid leukaemia. British Journal of Haematology, 102(2), 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00796.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free