Structural engineering and fire dynamics: Advances at the interface and Buchanan's challenge

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2008, Buchanan identified a necessary prerequisite for the advancement of structural fire engineering. He stated that "fire engineers and structural engineers need to talk to each other". In an attempt to address this need, the following paper provides a historical context of structural fire engineering and presents the results of research conducted when fire engineers and structural fire engineers do, indeed, talk to one another and work together on the same problem. The fire engineering approach is that developed by SternGottfried and Rein using travelling fires to capture realistic fire dynamics in a large compartment, and the structural fire approach by Law and Gillie on the whole frame behaviour of a concrete building. These techniques are not the only approaches, nor are they the ultimate product of Buchanan's challenge. However, they show how a rational approach to both fire engineering and structural engineering can provide design tools that would be meaningless or impossible otherwise. © 2011 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FIRE SAFETY SCIENCE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Law, A., Stern-Gottfried, J., Gillie, M., & Rein, G. (2011). Structural engineering and fire dynamics: Advances at the interface and Buchanan’s challenge. In Fire Safety Science (pp. 1563–1576). https://doi.org/10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.10-1563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free