Abstract
In this study, the discriminatory power of pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) methods for subtyping of 54 clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae were compared. All isolates were typeable by RAPD, while 3.6% of them were not typeable by PFGE. The repeatability of both typing methods were 100% with satisfying reproducibility (≥ 95%). Although the discriminatory power of PFGE was greater than RAPD, both methods showed sufficient discriminatory power (DI > 0.95) which reflects the heterogeneity among the K. pneumoniae isolates. An optimized RAPD protocol is less technically demanding and time consuming that makes it a reliable typing method and competitive with PFGE. © 2013, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ashayeri-Panah, M., Eftekhar, F., Ghamsari, M. M., Parvin, M., & Feizabadi, M. M. (2013). Genetic profiling of klebsiella pneumoniae: Comparison of pulsed field gel electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 44(3), 823–828. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013005000055
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.