Direct human interventions drive spatial variability in long-term peak streamflow trends across the United States

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding non-stationarity in annual peakflow is critical amid climate change and human interventions1,2. We analyzed trends in peakflow across 3907 streamflow sites with a median record length of 80 years in the continental United States. Results showed that one-third of the sites have significant trends. Of these, two-thirds showed decreasing trends nationwide, while one-third showed increasing trends in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions. We found urbanization and water management as primary drivers, with agriculture and climate as secondary. Urbanization explained up to 62% of the variance in Texas-Gulf, 44% in California, and 32% in the Mid-Atlantic regions. Water management dominated in Tennessee (37%) and Ohio (30%) regions. Agriculture was most influential in the Great Lakes (17%) region, while climate contributed in the Rio Grande (15%) and California (11%) regions. Although the latest climate model provides many realizations, it inadequately captures direct human interventions in the water system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joseph, J., Kumar, S., Merwade, V. M., & Johnson, D. R. (2025). Direct human interventions drive spatial variability in long-term peak streamflow trends across the United States. Communications Earth and Environment, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02738-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free