United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device solostar® versus other disposable pens

19Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The uptake of insulin pen use has been slow in the United States, despite their advantages over the vial/syringe. We present results of a United States subset of 150 patients with type 1/type 2 diabetes, who were enrolled in an open-label study, that assessed usability, pen features, and patient preferences for four prefilled insulin pens: SoloSTAR®, FlexPen ®, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype, Pen X. Overall, the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were more user-friendly; 95 and 88% of patients, respectively, completed the steps correctly (without safety/attach-needle step-deemed independent of device) versus the Lilly disposable pen (60%) and Pen X (61%; all p < 0.05). The SoloSTAR was rated highest most frequently for pen feature comparisons. Results suggest that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen could potentially facilitate insulin use in the United States. © Diabetes Technology Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fischer, J. S., Edelman, S. V., & Schwartz, S. L. (2008). United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device solostar® versus other disposable pens. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2(6), 1157–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200626

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free