Abstract
The uptake of insulin pen use has been slow in the United States, despite their advantages over the vial/syringe. We present results of a United States subset of 150 patients with type 1/type 2 diabetes, who were enrolled in an open-label study, that assessed usability, pen features, and patient preferences for four prefilled insulin pens: SoloSTAR®, FlexPen ®, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype, Pen X. Overall, the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were more user-friendly; 95 and 88% of patients, respectively, completed the steps correctly (without safety/attach-needle step-deemed independent of device) versus the Lilly disposable pen (60%) and Pen X (61%; all p < 0.05). The SoloSTAR was rated highest most frequently for pen feature comparisons. Results suggest that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen could potentially facilitate insulin use in the United States. © Diabetes Technology Society.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Fischer, J. S., Edelman, S. V., & Schwartz, S. L. (2008). United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device solostar® versus other disposable pens. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2(6), 1157–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200626
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.