Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients

15Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Current provision of services for the care of chronic wounds in Australia is disjointed and costly. There is large variability in the way that services are provided, and little evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of a specialist model of care for treatment and management. A decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a specialist wound care clinic as compared to usual care for chronic wounds is presented. We use retrospective and prospective data from a cohort of patients as well as information from administrative databases and published literature. Our results show specialist wound clinics are cost-effective for the management of chronic wounds. On average, specialist clinics were $3,947 cheaper than usual clinics and resulted in a quality adjusted life year gain of 0.04 per patient, per year. Specialist clinics were the best option under multiple scenarios including a different cost perspective and when the cost of a hospital admission was reduced. Current models of care are inefficient and represent low value care, and specialist wound clinics represent a good investment compared to current approaches for the management of chronic wounds in Australia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brain, D., Tulleners, R., Lee, X., Cheng, Q., Graves, N., & Pacella, R. (2019). Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients. PLoS ONE, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212366

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free