Why big data and compute are not necessarily the path to big materials science

38Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Applied machine learning has rapidly spread throughout the physical sciences. In fact, machine learning-based data analysis and experimental decision-making have become commonplace. Here, we reflect on the ongoing shift in the conversation from proving that machine learning can be used, to how to effectively implement it for advancing materials science. In particular, we advocate a shift from a big data and large-scale computations mentality to a model-oriented approach that prioritizes the use of machine learning to support the ecosystem of computational models and experimental measurements. We also recommend an open conversation about dataset bias to stabilize productive research through careful model interrogation and deliberate exploitation of known biases. Further, we encourage the community to develop machine learning methods that connect experiments with theoretical models to increase scientific understanding rather than incrementally optimizing materials. Moreover, we envision a future of radical materials innovations enabled by computational creativity tools combined with online visualization and analysis tools that support active outside-the-box thinking within the scientific knowledge feedback loop.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujinuma, N., DeCost, B., Hattrick-Simpers, J., & Lofland, S. E. (2022). Why big data and compute are not necessarily the path to big materials science. Communications Materials, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-022-00283-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free