Eurasian Great Power Triangle

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Can America afford to compete with two Eurasian great powers simultaneously? It clearly was able to act that way in the 1990s, at a time when Russia was weak and China not yet strong enough. Thus while building up its hegemony in the Asia-Pacific, Washington encroached upon Moscow’s traditional sphere of influence in continental Eurasia. Enjoying its unipolar moment, the U.S. was not afraid of angering both Russia and China. This policy of confronting the two great powers is still largely in place to this day. The Ukraine crisis of 2013–2014 has only served to underscore the unresolved antagonism between Russia and the U.S.-led West. The battle over Ukraine, whatever its final outcome may be, will inevitably make Russia less “European” and more “Asian”, pushing it closer to China. To avoid a new edition of confrontational bipolarity, Washington, Moscow and Beijing must strive to reach at least some modicum of accommodation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lukin, A. (2015). Eurasian Great Power Triangle. In Global Power Shift (pp. 183–205). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16289-8_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free