Choosing the international standards organization's Interlibrary Loan Protocol (ISO) or preserving the status quo?

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper chronicles an analysis of (1) interlibrary loan workflow and data and (2) how management used this information to make a decision on the ISO question. The National Library of Medicine adopted portions of the ISO Protocol for DOCLINE® 2004 as a response to the medical interlibrary loan community. ILLiad®, which is already ISO compliant, has responded by announcing an upcoming release of an ISO compatible version of their management system in 2005. If libraries choose to convert to ISO, one DOCLINE function, Loansome Doc®, will no longer be available. The question: Is the enhanced functionality with seamless DOCLINE and ILLiad interaction worth the effort that it will take to create and run a new Loansome Doc workflow?. © 2007 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piorun, M. E., & Fama, J. (2007). Choosing the international standards organization’s Interlibrary Loan Protocol (ISO) or preserving the status quo? Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve, 17(1–2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J474v17n01_08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free