Effects of introducing dynamic constraints for buckling to truss sizing optimization problems

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper the effects of adding buckling constraints to truss sizing optimization for minimizing mass are investigated. Introduction of buckling testing increases the complexity of the optimization process as Euler buckling criteria changes with each iteration of the optimization process due to the changes in element cross section dimensions. The resulting models which consider this criteria are practically applicable. For the purposes of showing the effects of dynamic constraints for buckling, optimal parametric standard test models of 10 bar, 17 bar, and 25 bar trusses from the literature are tested for buckling and compared to the models with the added constraint. Models which do not consider buckling criteria have a considerable number of elements which do not meet buckling criteria. The masses of these models are substantially smaller than their counterparts which consider buckling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petrović, N., Marjanović, N., Kostić, N., Blagojević, M., Matejić, M., & Troha, S. (2018). Effects of introducing dynamic constraints for buckling to truss sizing optimization problems. FME Transactions, 46(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1801117P

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free