Association of long-term outcome of long cervical fusion with sagittal balance: The significance of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction. Retrospective study to assess correlation between the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and the long-term outcomes of long cervical fusion due to cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), with the emphasis on T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1S-CL). Summary of background data. Growing evidence shows that the sagittal profile can play a major role in the outcomes of treatment, but the role of its correction is yet to be established. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 54 patients treated for CSM from 2006 to 2012. The neck pain-related disability was measured using NDI, the myelopathy was measured with the mJOA and Nurick scales. Six years after the surgery, standardised X-ray measurements were obtained, including C2–C7 lordosis (CL), C2–C7 sagittal vertical alignment (SVAC2-C7), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL). The patients were divided based on the T1S-CL into two groups, using the threshold value of 16.5 degrees. Results. A statistically significant improvement was noted in the mean NDI, mJOA, and median Nurick scale during the initial two years in both groups. The better aligned group had a better outcome measured with NDI at all follow-ups. The mJOA was significantly better in the better aligned group, but only preoperatively; at all follow-ups, the difference was not significant. T1S-CL had the strongest correlation with the NDI at the final follow-up. Conclusions. T1S-CL is an effective prognostic factor of the long term outcome after long cervical fusion in CSM treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janusz, W., Szmuda, T., Morasiewicz, P., Pettersson, S. D., & Miękisiak, G. (2022). Association of long-term outcome of long cervical fusion with sagittal balance: The significance of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska, 56(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free