Dielectric resonator method for determining gap symmetry of superconductors through anisotropic nonlinear Meissner effect

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a new measurement method which can be used to image the gap nodal structure of superconductors whose pairing symmetry is under debate. This technique utilizes a high quality factor microwave resonance involving the sample of interest. While supporting a circularly symmetric standing wave current pattern, the sample is perturbed by a scanned laser beam, creating a photoresponse that was previously shown to reveal the superconducting gap anisotropy. Simulation and the measurement of the photoresponse of an unpatterned Nb film show less than 8% anisotropy, as expected for a superconductor with a nearly isotropic energy gap along with expected systematic uncertainty. On the other hand, measurement of a YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7−δ thin film shows a clear 4-fold symmetric image with ∼12.5% anisotropy, indicating the well-known 4-fold symmetric dx2−y2 gap nodal structure in the ab-plane. The deduced gap nodal structure can be further cross-checked by low temperature surface impedance data, which are simultaneously measured. The important advantage of the presented method over the previous spiral resonator method is that it does not require a complicated lithographic patterning process which limits one from testing various kinds of materials due to photoresponse arising from patterning defects. This advantage of the presented technique, and the ability to measure unpatterned samples such as planar thin films and single crystals, enables one to survey the pairing symmetry of a wide variety of unconventional superconductors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bae, S., Tan, Y., Zhuravel, A. P., Zhang, L., Zeng, S., Liu, Y., … Anlage, S. M. (2019). Dielectric resonator method for determining gap symmetry of superconductors through anisotropic nonlinear Meissner effect. Review of Scientific Instruments, 90(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5090130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free