Prehospital Predictors of Survival in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

1Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Despite advances in the treatment of heart diseases, the outcome of patients experiencing sudden cardiac arrest remains poor. The aim of our study was to determine the prehospital variables as predictors of survival outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of OHCA cases. EMS protocols created in accordance with the Utstein style reporting for OHCA, first responder intervention reports, medical dispatch center dispatch protocols and hospital medical reports were all reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the following variables: age, gender, witnessed status, location, bystander CPR, first rhythm, and etiology. Results: A total of 381 interventions with resuscitation attempts were analyzed. In more than half (55%) of them, bystander CPR was performed. Thirty percent of all patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 22% of those achieved 30-day survival (7% of all OHCA victims), and 73% of those survived with Cerebral Performance Score 1 or 2. The logistic regression model of adjustment confirms that shockable initial rhythm was a predictor of ROSC [OR: 4.5 (95% CI: 2.5–8.1)] and 30-day survival [OR: 9.3 (95% CI: 2.9–29.2)]. Age was also associated (≤67 years) [OR: 3.9 (95% CI: 1.3–11.9)] with better survival. Conclusions: Elderly patients have a lower survival rate. The occurrence of bystander CPR in cardiac arrest remains alarmingly low. Shockable initial rhythm is associated with a better survival rate and neurological outcome compared with non-shockable rhythm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strnad, M., Borovnik Lesjak, V., Jerot, P., & Esih, M. (2023). Prehospital Predictors of Survival in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Medicina (Lithuania), 59(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free