Ghostwritten Lives: Autonomy, Deference, and Self-Authorship

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Certain forms of practical deference seem to be incompatible with personal autonomy. I argue that such deference undermines autonomy not by compromising the governance of an authentic self, nor by constituting a failure to track objective reasons, but by constituting a particular social relation: one of interpersonal rule. I analyze this social relation and distinguish it from others, including ordinary relations of love and care. Finally, I argue that the particular formof interpersonal rule constituted by dispositions of practical deference in itself entails a partial, though not total, disconnection from the good of a self-authored life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garnett, M. (2023). Ghostwritten Lives: Autonomy, Deference, and Self-Authorship. Ethics, 133(2), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1086/722126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free