Clinical comparative analysis of culture-proven bacterial keratitis according to prior topical steroid use: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center of South Korea

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients exposed to topical steroids before bacterial keratitis diagnosis (the prior topical steroid use, PS group), and compared these with those of the non-exposed group (the no prior topical steroid use, NPS group). We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients (PS, 34; NPS, 160) with culture-proven bacterial keratitis between 2007 and 2016. The microbiological profiles, epidemiology, predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of PS and NPS were compared, and the risk factors for surgical intervention were evaluated. Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were the most common isolates in PS and NPS, respectively, and no significant difference in the strain distribution between the two groups were observed. Significant differences were observed between PS and NPS for previous ocular surface disease (41.2%: 23.8%), initial BCVA < 0.1 (70.6%: 49.4%), epithelial defect size ≥ 5 mm2 (64.7%: 41.2%), epithelial healing time > 14 days (55.9%: 37.3%), and surgical intervention (23.5%: 8.8%). Prior topical steroid use, strong steroid use, and long-term steroid use groups were included in significant risk factors for surgical intervention. Previous exposure to topical steroids before the diagnosis of bacterial keratitis was associated with a worse initial clinical presentation and treatment outcomes. Additional multicenter studies should be conducted in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, C. H., Choi, N. H., & Lee, S. B. (2023). Clinical comparative analysis of culture-proven bacterial keratitis according to prior topical steroid use: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center of South Korea. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41588-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free