Relationship between childhood short stature and academic achievement in adolescents and young adults - A longitudinal study

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To determine if short stature at 14 or 21years and patterns of 'catch-up' growth from 5 to 14 or 21years are related to academic achievement in adolescents. Methods: The Mater University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy is a longitudinal study of 7223 singleton infants born between 1981 and 1984. Data were available for cross-sectional analyses of 3785 adolescents of whom 2149 were seen as young adults. Longitudinal patterns of growth were examined for 2936 subjects from 5 to 14years and 1753 subjects from 5 to 21years. Results: Adolescents or young adults with height <10th centile had a lower mean Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) score in adolescence and at 21years than those of normal height (2.7 and 3.0 points, respectively) and increased odds of a WRAT score <85 (1.57 and 1.87, respectively) and learning difficulties (1.61 and 1.78, respectively). For growth patterns from 5 to 14years, adolescents short at 5years, irrespective of height at 14years, had a lower mean WRAT score and increased odds of WRAT score <85 and learning difficulties. However, for growth patterns from 5 to 21 years, only the group short at both ages had increased learning difficulties. Conclusions: Youth short at 14years or at 21years and those persistently short have an increased prevalence of academic difficulties. Catch-up growth by 21, although not 14years, was associated with improved outcomes. © 2010 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tran, U. N., O’Callaghan, M. J., Mamun, A. A., Najman, J. M., Williams, G. M., & Bor, W. (2010). Relationship between childhood short stature and academic achievement in adolescents and young adults - A longitudinal study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 46(11), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01816.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free