Novice designers tackle and reflect on their process using the designerly activity theory

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Schön used the metaphor of the swamp and mountain to express the divide between the problems tackled by practitioners and scientists. This research is concerned about the same persisting dilemma between design practice and design theory. In an attempt to discuss this dilemma, we propose to explore research through design (RtD) as a privileged approach where novice designers gain knowledge as practitioners and as researchers. Being aware that RtD approach has received criticisms regarding validity, bias and reliability, we put forward a set of theoretical tools allowing designers to simultaneously proceed with design activity and data gathering processes. To do so, the designerly activity theory framework was presented and explained to two novice designers. They were asked to use the theory’s model during an internship project experience, to record their daily actions and later, to proceed with analysis of gathered data. Doing so, we gained a clearer interpretation of the impacts of using a theoretical model as a complement for research through design. We discuss the depth of the participants’ reflections, the awareness to less noticeable components, and the enriched dialog between practice and theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tessier, V., & Zahedi, M. (2021). Novice designers tackle and reflect on their process using the designerly activity theory. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 1, pp. 2257–2266). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.487

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free