Covid-19 and the failure of labour law: Part 1

25Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, we consider how Covid-19 revealed the extent to which, in Britain, the core functions of labour law have been compromised by successive governments stretching back to the 1980s and how workers collectively have been failed as a result by a discipline intended ostensibly in their interests. We seek to measure these deficits against a set of core normative principles rooted in ILO standards which we believe underpin labour law as a discipline of worker protection. We look first at the exploitation of critical workers; second at the failure generally to make adequate provision for income security; and third at issues relating to health and safety at work. Our consideration of these issues addresses both the substantive law and the means for its enforcement. Having considered the systemic failures and lack of resilience of British labour law in this article, we intend to return to the theme in Part II at a later date to address the lessons learned and the overhaul which the pandemic has revealed to be necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ewing, K. D., & Lord Hendy, Q. C. (2020, December 1). Covid-19 and the failure of labour law: Part 1. Industrial Law Journal. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free