Research ethics 2.0: new perspectives on norms, values, and integrity in genomic research in times of even scarcer resources

16Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Research ethics anew gained importance due to the changing scientific landscape and increasing demands and competition in the academic field. These changes are further exaggerated because of scarce(r) resources in some countries on the one hand and advances in genomics on the other. In this paper, we will highlight the current challenges thereof to scientific integrity. To mark key developments in research ethics, we will distinguish between what we call research ethics 1.0 and research ethics 2.0. Whereas research ethics 1.0 focuses on individual integrity and informed consent, research ethics 2.0 entails social scientific integrity within a broader perspective of a research network. This research network can be regarded as a network of responsibilities in which every stakeholder involved has to jointly meet the ethical challenges posed to research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brall, C., Maeckelberghe, E., Porz, R., Makhoul, J., & Schröder-Bäck, P. (2017, June 1). Research ethics 2.0: new perspectives on norms, values, and integrity in genomic research in times of even scarcer resources. Public Health Genomics. S. Karger AG. https://doi.org/10.1159/000462960

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free