The impact of DNA input amount and DNA source on the performance of whole-exome sequencing in cancer epidemiology

21Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has recently emerged as an appealing approach to systematically study coding variants. However, the requirement for a large amount of highquality DNA poses a barrier that may limit its application in large cancer epidemiologic studies. We evaluated the performance of WES with low input amount and saliva DNA as an alternative source material. Methods: Five breast cancer patients were randomly selected from the Pathways Study. From each patient, four samples, including 3 mg, 1 mg, and 0.2 mg blood DNA and 1 mg saliva DNA, were aliquoted for library preparation using the Agilent SureSelect Kit and sequencing using Illumina HiSeq2500. Quality metrics of sequencing and variant calling, as well as concordance of variant calls from the whole exome and 21 known breast cancer genes, were assessed by input amount and DNA source. Results: There was little difference by input amount or DNA source on the quality of sequencing and variant calling. The concordance ratewas about 98%for single-nucleotide variant calls and 83% to 86% for short insertion/deletion calls. For the 21 known breast cancer genes, WES based on low input amount and saliva DNAidentifiedthesamesetvariants insamples fromasamepatient. Conclusions: Low DNA input amount, as well as saliva DNA, can be used to generate WES data of satisfactory quality. Impact: Our findings support the expansion of WES applications in cancer epidemiologic studies where only low DNA amount or saliva samples are available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, Q., Hu, Q., Shepherd, L., Wang, J., Wei, L., Morrison, C. D., … Yao, S. (2015). The impact of DNA input amount and DNA source on the performance of whole-exome sequencing in cancer epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 24(8), 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free