Age Differences in Negative, but Not Positive, Rumination

27Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of this study was to determine whether there are age differences in positive and negative repetitive thought (ie, rumination). Method: Young adults (ages 19-39; n = 114) and older adults (ages 60-85; n = 88) completed measures of negative and positive rumination. Bayesian analyses were used to determine whether age differences were present for both negative (young > old) and positive (old > young) rumination. Results: There was extremely strong evidence for age differences in negative rumination, with lower scores in older adults. In contrast, the evidence was in favor of the null hypothesis for positive rumination. Discussion: Age-related positivity is better characterized as decreased dwelling on the meaning of negative moods, rather than increased attention to positive ones.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Emery, L., Sorrell, A., & Miles, C. (2020). Age Differences in Negative, but Not Positive, Rumination. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free