Broader health coverage is good for the nation's health: Evidence from country level panel data

69Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Summary: Progress towards universal health coverage involves providing people with access to needed health services without entailing financial hardship and is often advocated on the grounds that it improves population health. The paper offers econometric evidence on the effects of health coverage on mortality outcomes at the national level. We use a large panel data set of countries, examined by using instrumental variable specifications that explicitly allow for potential reverse causality and unobserved country-specific characteristics. We employ various proxies for the coverage level in a health system. Our results indicate that expanded health coverage, particularly through higher levels of publicly funded health spending, results in lower child and adult mortality, with the beneficial effect on child mortality being larger in poorer countries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moreno-Serra, R., & Smith, P. C. (2015). Broader health coverage is good for the nation’s health: Evidence from country level panel data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 178(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free