National Health Expenditure Limits: The Case for a Global Budget Process

  • Bishop C
  • Wallack S
22Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The health reform cost-containment debate has set up a dichotomy between market and regulatory approaches. Expenditures are excessive in the American health system because there is no effective constraint on aggregate demand, and the rigid limits imposed by sectoral global budgets in other nations do not effectively use supply side forces to achieve efficiency. The case for an intermediate option is presented, a process that can flexibly encompass both what buyers are willing to pay and what suppliers are willing to accept. A negotiated contracting process for multiple payors and multiple providers could constrain aggregate demand and harness provider incentives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bishop, C. E., & Wallack, S. S. (1996). National Health Expenditure Limits: The Case for a Global Budget Process. The Milbank Quarterly, 74(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free