Characterization of complete Currarino syndrome in pediatrics—a comparison between CT and MRI

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study sought to analyze the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of the classical triad elements and the associated anomalies in pediatric complete Currarino syndrome (CS) to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 different imaging methods in displaying the abnormalities of this disease. METHODS The clinical and radiological features of 32 pediatric patients with complete CS diagnosed histologically and/or radiologically were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS All 32 complete CS patients presented with the classical triad of congenital anorectal malformation (ARM), sacral agenesis, and presacral mass. Anal atresia, which is the most common congenital ARM, was observed in 19 of the 32 patients (59.4%). Sacral agenesis was mainly type IV (75%). Among the presacral masses, true tumors and pseudotumors accounted for about half each. All of the 15 true tumors were presacral teratomas. Twenty-five patients had associated anomalies, including tethered cord, filum lipoma, and hydronephrosis. Twenty-four patients underwent both CT and MRI examinations. While CT was better than MRI in displaying sacral anomaly (P<0.05), MRI was more sensitive than CT at detecting presacral mass, spinal dysraphism, and congenital anal atresia (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS CT and MRI have different efficiencies at displaying the abnormalities of the complete CS. As a non-invasive method, MRI has significant advantages in diagnosing complete CS, especially in revealing the details of ARM, presacral mass, and associated spinal dysraphism.