Study of the occurrence of interchromosomal effect in spermatozoa of chromosomal rearrangement carriers by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and primed in-situ labelling techniques

71Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The possibility that a chromosomal rearrangement might disturb the meiotic behaviour of chromosomes not involved in the rearrangement and favour non-disjunction is a controversial issue in human cytogenetics. Using two-colour fluorescence in-situ hybridization and primed in-situ labelling techniques, we have investigated the segregation pattern of 10 chromosomes (chromosomes 1, 4, 9, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, X and Y) in spermatozoa from nine carriers of balanced structural rearrangements and three normal men. The patients were divided into two groups according to their semen parameters. In rearrangement carriers and normal subjects, sex chromosomes and chromosome 21 displayed a higher rate of disomy than the other chromosomes. No evidence for the occurrence of interchromosomal effect was found in the spermatozoa of fertile rearrangement carriers, but significant variations were observed for all chromosomes tested in the group of infertile translocation carriers, suggesting a direct correlation between poor quality spermatozoa and increased aneuploidy rate in the group. In fertile carriers of chromosomal rearrangements, the occurrence of non-disjunction of chromosomes not involved in the rearrangement might therefore be considered as fortuitous, whereas in infertile carriers, the risk for interchromosomal effect appears to be real and should be taken into consideration in the genetic counselling of infertile couples with a male partner carrying a chromosomal rearrangement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pellestor, F., Imbert, I., Andréo, B., & Lefort, G. (2001). Study of the occurrence of interchromosomal effect in spermatozoa of chromosomal rearrangement carriers by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and primed in-situ labelling techniques. Human Reproduction, 16(6), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.6.1155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free