In his original contribution, Exner's principal concern was a comparison between the properties of different aftereffects, and particularly to determine whether aftereffects of motion were similar to those of color and whether they could be encompassed within a unified physiological framework. Despite the fact that he was unable to answer his main question, there are some excellent-so far unknown-contributions in Exner's paper. For example, he describes observations that can be related to binocular interaction, not only in motion aftereffects but also in rivalry. To the best of our knowledge, Exner provides the first description of binocular rivalry induced by differently moving patterns in each eye, for motion as well as for their aftereffects. Moreover, apart from several known, but beautifully addressed, phenomena he makes a clear distinction between motion in depth based on stimulus properties and motion in depth based on the interpretation of motion. That is, the experience of movement, as distinct from the perception of movement. The experience, unlike the perception, did not result in a motion aftereffect in depth.
CITATION STYLE
Verstraten, F. A. J., Niehorster, D. C., van de Grind, W. A., & Wade, N. J. (2015). Sigmund Exner’s (1887) einige beobachtungen über bewegungsnachbilder (some observations on movement aftereffects): An illustrated translation with commentary. I-Perception, 6(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515593044
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.