Coiling of very large and giant basilar tip aneurysms: Midterm clinical and angiographic results

29Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the midterm clinical and angiographic results of coiling of very large (>15 mm) and giant basilar tip aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and October 2005, 44 very large and giant basilar tip aneurysms in 44 patients were coiled. There were 13 men (30%) and 31 women (70%) with a mean age of 51.4 years (median, 51 years; range, 34-72 years). Mean aneurysm size was 19.6 mm (range, 15-30 mm). Of 44 aneurysms, 33 (75%) had ruptured. Of 11 unruptured basilar tip aneurysms, 7 were incidentally discovered, 1 was additional to another ruptured aneurysm, and 3 were symptomatic by mass effect. RESULTS: Procedural mortality was 2/44 (4.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4%-16%) and morbidity 1/44 (2.3%, 95% CI, 0.01%-13%). Of 33 patients with ruptured aneurysms, mean clinical follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 0.5-11.5 years). Two patients had a rebleeding from the coiled basilar tip aneurysm leading to death in 1 patient and to dependency in the other patient (annual rebleeding rate, 1.1%) One other patient died 2 years later of progressive brain stem compression. Mean angiographic follow-up in 41 of 42 surviving patients was 3.1 years. Nineteen aneurysms reopened and were coiled for a second time. Of these, 9 repeatedly reopened with time and were repeatedly coiled up to 6 times. Additional treatments were without complications. CONCLUSION: Coiling of very large and giant basilar tip aneurysms is associated with reasonably low morbidity. Although additional treatment during follow-up is frequently necessary, rebleeding is uncommon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Rooij, W. J., & Sluzewski, M. (2007). Coiling of very large and giant basilar tip aneurysms: Midterm clinical and angiographic results. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 28(7), 1405–1408. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free