An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy

17Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: A retrospective evaluation of pre- and post-operative audiometric data at a single large UK cochlear implant centre over 25 years was undertaken. Methods: Analysis of pre-operative hearing levels showed that there was a modest but significant reduction in average pre-operative hearing thresholds among patients referred between 1990 and 2015, particularly in the low frequencies. Outcomes: The proportion of those referred who would meet widely-accepted candidacy criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) grew significantly over time but in the period 2011-2015 just 9% of those referred had sufficient residual hearing for EAS. On average, implant recipients lost 20 dB hearing at frequencies ≤1000 Hz as a result of the surgery. Conclusions: The findings suggest that hearing preservation is now widely achievable, and that both candidacy criteria and referrer education should take into account potential EAS benefit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verschuur, C., Hellier, W., & Teo, C. (2016). An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy. Cochlear Implants International, 17, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1152007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free