The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment on Verbal Scores in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Retrospective Trial

Abstract

Introduction Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects millions worldwide. Suggested pathophysiology includes cerebral hypoperfusion, inflammation, mitochondrial and immune dysregulation, and oxidative stress. Debate exists concerning the benefit of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in treating ASD and its impacts on verbal behavior. The present study directly assesses the impacts of HBOT treatments on verbal behavior using a novel and unique manner.  Materials and methods A two-group quasi-experimental trial using a pretest and a posttest was designed to retrospectively assess (n = 65) any association between HBOT and change in verbal scores in children (n = 65) with ASD. All children completed two verbal tests six months apart, either the Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program (VBMAPP) or the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills (ABLLS), based on their developmental age. The control cohort received applied behavior analysis (ABA) without HBOT. The experimental cohort received ABA and a minimum of 40 HBOT treatments, breathing 100% oxygen at 2.0 atmosphere absolute (ATA) for 60 minutes. Results Sixty-five children were included, of which 32 received HBOT (mean (M) = 5.1, standard deviation (SD) = 2.93), with an age range of two to 17 years. More than 63% of the subjects had an autism severity level of three. The 23 children administered VBMAPP who received HBOT showed substantial mean differences with high effect sizes (ESs) (-0.743 to -1.65) and a total score (TS) ES equal to -1.23 as measured by Cohen's d. There was a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in all VBMAPP milestone domains and TS. TS change from baseline versus those in the non-HBOT (Control-ABA) group (n=12) was 46.41 ± 20.14 vs 14.42 ± 6.99; p < 0.0001, ES = -1.23. The 30 children administered the ABLLS showed substantial mean difference (TS) change from baseline 268.89 ± 182.05 vs 190.81 ± 135.26 and exhibited small to medium (-.114 to -.773) ESs with a TS ES = -0.487. Due to the high within-group variability (low statistical power) within the ABLLS cohort, there was a non-significant mean difference between the control (ABA) and experimental (ABA + HBO2) groups' difference scores (p > 0.2024), despite the medium (TS) ES. Conclusions The child cohorts administered the VBMAPP and the ABLLS demonstrated substantial improvements between the non-HBOT (control-ABA) and HBOT (experimental-ABA + HBO2) groups as measured by the significant mean differences and small to large ESs. Simply put, the children in the experimental cohort acquired more verbal skills than their counterparts in the control group.