2.5 years’ experience of GeneMatcher data-sharing: a powerful tool for identifying new genes responsible for rare diseases

21Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Exome sequencing (ES) powerfully identifies the molecular bases of heterogeneous conditions such as intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies (ID/MCA). Current ES analysis, combining diagnosis analysis restricted to disease-causing genes reported in OMIM database and subsequent research investigation extended to other genes, indicated causal and candidate genes around 40% and 10%. Nonconclusive results are frequent in such ultrarare conditions that recurrence and genotype-phenotype correlations are limited. International data-sharing permits the gathering of additional patients carrying variants in the same gene to draw definitive conclusions on their implication as disease causing. Several web-based tools have been developed and grouped in Matchmaker Exchange. In this study, we report our current experience as a regional center that has implemented ES as a first-line diagnostic test since 2013, working with a research laboratory devoted to disease gene identification. Methods: We used GeneMatcher over 2.5 years to share 71 novel candidate genes identified by ES. Results: Matches occurred in 60/71 candidate genes allowing to confirm the implication of 39% of matched genes as causal and to rule out 6% of them. Conclusion: The introduction of user-friendly gene-matching tools, such as GeneMatcher, appeared to be an essential step for the rapid identification of novel disease genes responsible for ID/MCA.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bruel, A. L., Vitobello, A., Mau-Them, F. T., Nambot, S., Duffourd, Y., Quéré, V., … Thauvin-Robinet, C. (2019). 2.5 years’ experience of GeneMatcher data-sharing: a powerful tool for identifying new genes responsible for rare diseases. Genetics in Medicine, 21(7), 1657–1661. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0383-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free