Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: A systematic review

9Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed gynecologic surgeries, mainly for uterine myomas, abnormal uterine bleeding, and prolapses. It can be performed through several routes, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate recent advances in surgical outcomes of benign total hysterectomies by any route: vaginal (VH), laparoscopic (LH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal (LAVH), single-port (SP), and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RH). The search was applied to the PubMed electronic database by using keywords " hysterectomy" and " uterine benign disease", " adenomyosis", and " myoma". Prospective and randomized trials of the last 3 years were included. Nine studies were selected and showed that VH was superior to LH, LAVH, and RH in terms of hospital stay and operation time and had the same complication rate and lower costs. SP hysterectomy had no clear advantages over VH or conventional LH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abrão, M. S., Andres, M. de P., & Borrelli, G. M. (2017). Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: A systematic review. F1000Research. Faculty of 1000 Ltd. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11523.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free