Classified Public Whistleblowing: How to Justify a Pro Tanto Wrong

  • Boot E
Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text


Though whistleblowing is quickly becoming an accepted means of addressing wrongdoing, whistleblower protection laws and the relevant case law are either awkwardly silent, unclear or mutually inconsistent concerning public disclosures of classified government information. I remedy this problem by first arguing that such disclosures constitute a pro tanto wrong as they violate (1) promissory obligations, (2) role obligations and (3) the obligation to respect the democratic allocation of power. However, they may be justified if (1) the information disclosed concerns grave government wrongdoing, (2) alternative channels of disclosure are first exhausted and (3) steps are taken to minimize harm.

Author supplied keywords




Boot, E. (2017). Classified Public Whistleblowing: How to Justify a Pro Tanto Wrong. Social Theory and Practice, 43(3), 541–567.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free