Muscle or motivation? A stop-signal study on the effects of sequential cognitive control

19Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Performance on cognitive control tasks deteriorates when control tasks are performed together with other control tasks, that is, if simultaneous cognitive control is required. Surprisingly, this is also observed if control tasks are preceded by other control tasks, that is, if sequential cognitive control is required. The typical explanation for the latter finding is that previous acts of cognitive control deplete a common resource, just like a muscle becomes fatigued after repeated usage. An alternative explanation, however, is that previous acts of cognitive control reduce motivation to match allocated resources to required resources. In this paper we formalize these muscle and motivation accounts, and show that they yield differential predictions regarding the interaction between simultaneous and sequential cognitive control. These predictions were tested using a paradigm where participants had to perform multiple stop-signal tasks, which varied in their demands on simultaneous and sequential control. Results of two studies supported predictions derived from the motivation account.Therefore, we conclude that the effects of sequential cognitive control are best explained in terms of a reduction of motivation to match allocated to required resources. © 2012 Huizenga, van der Molen, Bexkens, Bos and van den Wildenberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huizenga, H. M., van der Molen, M. W., Bexkens, A., Bos, M. G. N., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2012). Muscle or motivation? A stop-signal study on the effects of sequential cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free