Normal saline versus Normosol™-R in sepsis resuscitation: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of Normosol™-R as compared to normal saline on the outcomes of acute kidney injury and the need for renal replacement therapy in the resuscitation phase of sepsis. Design: Our study is a retrospective before-and-after cohort study. Setting: The study occurred at a 700-bed tertiary academic level 1-trauma center. Patients: A total of 1218 patients were enrolled through emergency department admissions. The normal saline (before) cohort was defined as the dates between 1 March and 30 September 2014 and the Normosol™-R (after) cohort was assessed from 1 March to 30 September 2015. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: Intravenous fluid volumes received during the first 24 h, 72 h, and total hospital stays were compared. Sodium, chloride, potassium, and bicarbonate levels at 72 h were also compared. The medical coded diagnosis of acute kidney failure, need for renal replacement therapy, hospital LOS, ICU admission, ICU LOS, in-hospital mortality, and need for mechanical ventilation were all compared. There was no significant difference in intravenous fluid volumes between groups. Regression modelling controlling for baseline characteristics and 24-h fluid intake volume found no differences between groups for the primary outcomes of acute kidney injury (P = 0.99) and renal replacement therapy (P = 0.88). Patients in the Normosol™-R cohort were found to have a lower rate of hyperchloremia at 72 h post-admission (28% vs. 13%, P < 0.0001). There was a trend toward a decrease in the hospital and ICU LOS in the Normosol™-R cohort; however, the data were not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study was unable to detect any difference in outcomes between sepsis patients who received intravenous fluid resuscitation with either a balanced crystalloid (Normosol™-R) or normal saline, except for a decreased rate of hyperchloremia.