The effects of the performance measurement system debate and cognitive conflict on ambidextrous innovation

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study follows the flow of research that investigated the relationship between the performance measurement system and innovation but differs in considering innovation as a multidimensional construct. This study analyzes the effects of the performance measurement system debate and cognitive conflict on ambidextrous innovation. A survey was conducted with managers of companies listed in Brazil Bolsa Balcão (B3), according to the ranking of research and development values and intangible assets, and 124 valid answers were obtained. To test the hypotheses we used the structural equation modeling technique. The results revealed that the performance measurement system debate positively influences ambidextrous innovation and that cognitive conflict moderates this relationship. It is concluded that discussions between managers about performance measures allow the problem-solving, pursuit of learning, creativity, and innovation, especially when intensified by cognitive conflict.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Monteiro, J. J., & Beuren, I. M. (2020). The effects of the performance measurement system debate and cognitive conflict on ambidextrous innovation. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizacoes, 14. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2020.170418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free