Why fish pain cannot and should not be ruled out

  • Seth A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanisms underlying conscious pain reports in humans can be identified in fish. This strategy fails in three ways. First, non-mammalian consciousness — if it exists — may depend on different mechanisms. Second, accumulating neurophysiological and behavioural evidence, evolutionary considerations, and emerging Bayesian brain theories suggest that if fish can feel at all, they can feel pain. Finally, the qualitative nature of pain and suffering obliges us, via the precautionary principle, to accommodate the possibility of its existence where doubt remains.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seth, A. K. (2016). Why fish pain cannot and should not be ruled out. Animal Sentience, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1038

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free