Judicial Crisis in Damascus on the Eve of Baybars's Reform: The Case of the Minor Orphan Girl (651-55/1253-57)

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay reconstructs a late-Ayyubid court case in Damascus that was litigated repeatedly between 651/1253 and 655/1257, five years prior to the beginning of Sultan Baybars's judicial reform in 660/1262. The case involved the marriage of a minor orphan girl. The Shāfiī chief justice of Damascus initially permitted the marriage but later instructed his deputy judge to annul it, a move that outraged jurists and elicited a transregional debate. I reconstruct the case proceedings and ensuing controversies primarily from an unpublished treatise by Abū Shāma al-Maqdisī (d. 665/1268), which is partly corroborated by contemporaneous fatwas and historical chronicles. The case illustrates that pre-reform Ayyubid courts lacked the coherent jurisprudence and institutional oversight that might have prevented abuses of power by unscrupulous and inept officials. Although Baybars's reform has long been recognized as a critical turning point in Islamic legal history, this case exposes the social and institutional dilemmas that the reform sought to address.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheibani, M. (2022). Judicial Crisis in Damascus on the Eve of Baybars’s Reform: The Case of the Minor Orphan Girl (651-55/1253-57). Islamic Law and Society, 29(4), 425–456. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-bja10020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free