Commodity Production and Indigenous Institutions in Southeast Asian Long-Run Economic Development

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Making of a Periphery makes three important claims. First, commodity export production does not necessarily result in peripheralization, which is defined as economic stagnation, depressed wages and impoverishment. Second, peripheralization is instead influenced by the specific mode of production of export commodities. Third, the mode of production is crucially determined by demographic growth and patron-client relationships. This essay investigates these claims using a variety of economic and demographic data on Southeast Asia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It is shown that specialization in primary commodity exports does lower long-term economic growth rates and that indigenous institutions regarding family systems and property rights play an important role in the patterns of economic development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Zwart, P. (2020, December 1). Commodity Production and Indigenous Institutions in Southeast Asian Long-Run Economic Development. International Review of Social History. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859020000528

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free